Audi 80 1991 vs BMW 3 series 1994

 
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
BMW 3 series
1994 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 150 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.9 seconds14 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 15 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.5
Audi 80 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litresno data
Audi 80 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`740
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv