Audi 80 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1991

	Audi 80 1992 - 1994	BMW 3 series 1991 - 1993
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	1.6 Petrol	1.6 Petrol
Performance
Power:	71 HP	99 HP
Torque:	127 NM	141 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	15.4 seconds	13 seconds
	BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 28 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 14 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	7.9	7.9
Fuel tank capacity:	66 litres	65 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	830 km in combined cycle	820 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Front wheel drive (FWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions
Length:	4.48 m	4.43 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.70 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.39 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	430 litres	435 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	710 litres	no data
	Audi 80 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter:	11.2 meters	10 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	1`640	1`650

Safety:	no data
Quality:	average	low
	Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better
Average price (€):	800	2600
Rating in user reviews:	7.5/10	7.2/10
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has fewer faults lower price	BMW 3 sērija has more power more dynamic better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1991

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions