Audi 80 1993 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 56 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi 80 1993 2.8 engine: This engine, especially at higher mileages, often tends to consume oil, and the timing belt change interval in particular should be observed. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |