Audi 80 1992 vs Volvo V50 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
540 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
Volvo V50 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |