Audi 80 1992 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP230 HP
Torque: 225 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds7.3 seconds
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.19.5
Real fuel consumption: 12.1 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
540 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.41 m1.46 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litresno data
Volvo V50 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9402`020
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 8003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv