Audi 80 1992 vs Volvo 850 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 50 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 23 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo 850 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |