Audi 80 1992 vs Opel Omega 1995

 
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Opel Omega
1995 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 148 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds14 seconds
Audi 80 engine produces 26 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.2
Audi 80 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1010 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years4 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.41 m1.50 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 34 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litres1800 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 600 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Omega.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7802`010
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons:
    Opel Omega has
    • more power
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv