Audi 80 1992 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Audi 80 and Ford Escort have the same engine power, but Audi 80 torque is 14 NM more than Ford Escort. Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi 80 is larger. Audi 80 is 21 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 80 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Ford Escort has
| |