Audi 80 1992 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Sierra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |