Audi 80 1993 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 46 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1993 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V50 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |