Audi 80 1992 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Audi 80 and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 1150 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Audi 80 is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 466 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1426 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 80 has 96 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Audi 80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi 80, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |