Audi 80 1992 vs Subaru Impreza 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi 80) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Impreza) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 121 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 6.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Audi 80 is larger. Audi 80 is 13 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Subaru Impreza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Subaru Impreza, so Subaru Impreza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |