Audi 80 1992 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 40 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1150 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 34 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 600 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Omega. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |