Audi 80 1992 vs Honda Accord 1995

 
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Honda Accord
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Audi 80) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Accord) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP136 HP
Torque: 202 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds10.8 seconds
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 46 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 18 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.59.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1200 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1150 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat AlhambraUsed also on Honda CR-V
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi 80 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ...  More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.77 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 29 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1200 litres739 litres
Audi 80 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 80 (by 461 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight: 1`860 kg1`880 kg
Net weight:1`310 kg1`365 kg
Load capacity:550 kg515 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Honda Accord has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably better
Average price (€): 8002000
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv