Audi 80 1992 vs Volkswagen Passat 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 1150 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 19 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`975 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |