Audi 80 1992 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 80 engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.4 | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi 80 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 80 is 28 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Skoda Felicia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Felicia, so Skoda Felicia quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |