Audi 80 1994 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
Audi 80
1994 - 1995
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP136 HP
Torque: 150 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.3 seconds9.6 seconds
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.65.8
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1130 km on highway
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.41 m1.46 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
650 litresno data
Volvo V50 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8601`960
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 8003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv