Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Audi 80 engine produces 8 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V50 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`830 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`270 kg | 1`381 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 509 kg | |
| Audi 80 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Volvo V50. Therefore, Audi 80 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |