Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 66 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 9400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |