Audi 80 1991 vs Mazda 626 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 80 engine produces 50 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Audi 80 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1315 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |