Audi 80 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1991

 
Audi 80
1990 - 1991
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP99 HP
Torque: 118 NM141 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds13 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 29 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 23 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1060 km on highway
840 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 3 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litresno data
Audi 80 has 10 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4901`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 8002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv