Audi 80 1991 vs BMW 3 series 1994

 
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
BMW 3 series
1994 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 182 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds14 seconds
Audi 80 and BMW 3 series have the same engine power, but Audi 80 torque is 8 NM less than BMW 3 series. Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.26.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1260 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1730 km on highway1250 km on highway
1150 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Audi 80 has 10 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Audi 80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`740
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv