Audi 80 1991 vs BMW 3 series 1991

 
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP150 HP
Torque: 165 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 35 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 25 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km9.3 l/100km
By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Audi 80 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litres1200 litres
Audi 80 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 490 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7901`760
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv