Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi 80 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Audi 80 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1034 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 324 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |