Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2002

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1988
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP109 HP
Torque: 125 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12 seconds
Audi 80 engine produces 34 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S40.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.57.7
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 420 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv