Audi 80 1986 vs Audi A3 2004

	Audi 80 1986 - 1988	Audi A3 2004 - 2008
Body:	Sedan	Hatchback
	The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	1.6 Petrol	1.6 Petrol
Performance
Power:	75 HP	102 HP
Torque:	125 NM	148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	n/a seconds	13.2 seconds
	Audi 80 engine produces 27 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Audi A3.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	10.5	7.6
	The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 435 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	68 litres	55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	640 km in combined cycle	720 km in combined cycle
	Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.39 m	4.29 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.76 m
Height:	1.40 m	1.42 m
	Audi 80 is 10 cm longer than the Audi A3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	485 litres	370 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1120 litres
	Audi 80 has more luggage capacity. Audi 80 has 115 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter:	10.3 meters	10.7 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg):	1`480	1`855

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	above average
Average price (€):	1600	3200
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has roomier boot lower price	Audi A3 has more power lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1986 vs Audi A3 2004

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions