Audi 80 1986 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1988
Audi 100
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 125 NM142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.2 seconds
Audi 80 engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Audi 100.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.1
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi 100 1988: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.79 m
Width: 1.70 m1.81 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 40 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres570 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data610 litres
Audi 100 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv