Audi 80 1986 vs BMW 3 series 1999

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1988
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP105 HP
Torque: 125 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14 seconds
Audi 80 engine produces 30 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 3 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.0
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres440 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 12001800
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv