Audi 80 1986 vs Audi A2 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Audi 80 engine produces 35 HP less power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi A2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.9 | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Audi 80 is larger, but lower. Audi 80 is 56 cm longer than the Audi A2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 80 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity. Audi 80 has 95 litres more trunk space than the Audi A2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Audi A2 has
| |