Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 80 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 140 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 181 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 22 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 11.5 | 5.4 - 10.0 | |
|
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`538 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |