Audi 80 1986 vs Volkswagen Passat 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1991
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 54 - 140 HP90 - 193 HP
Torque: 100 - 181 NM140 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 22 seconds7.9 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 11.55.5 - 11.0
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.67 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.50 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres495 litres
Audi 80 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`538~ 1`999
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv