Audi 80 1986 vs BMW 3 series 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1991
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi 80 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi 80 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.9 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 54 - 140 HP105 - 231 HP
Torque: 100 - 181 NM165 - 390 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 22 seconds6.5 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 11.55.7 - 10.0
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres440 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`538~ 1`936
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 12001800
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv