Audi 80 1990 vs BMW 2 series 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 80
1990 - 1995
BMW 2 series
2013 - 2017
Body: SedanCabrio
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi 80 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 2 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi 80 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 70 - 174 HP136 - 340 HP
Torque: 118 - 250 NM220 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 17.5 seconds4.6 - 9.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 10.34.1 - 8.5
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 2 series. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 110 - 135 mm (4.3 - 5.3 inches)130 - 140 mm (5.1 - 5.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.44 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Audi 80 is 4 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litres335 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Audi 80 has 150 litres more trunk space than the BMW 2 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 80 (by 375 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`745~ 2`015
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 80025 600
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 2 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv