Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo V50 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 75 - 174 HP100 - 230 HP
Torque: 130 - 245 NM150 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 16.7 seconds6.9 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 10.55.0 - 10.1
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.52 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.41 m1.46 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litresno data
Volvo V50 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`879~ 1`943
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 8003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv