Audi 100 1989 vs Volvo 940 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 164 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Audi 100 and Volvo 940 have the same engine power, but Audi 100 torque is 19 NM more than Volvo 940. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.6 | |
Audi 100 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Audi 100 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 992 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 2125 litres | |
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Audi 100 has 348 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 205 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |