Audi 100 1989 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Audi 100 engine produces 38 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Despite less power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler 300M is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi 100 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi 100 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi 100 is smaller. Audi 100 is 21 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 114 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. The Chrysler 300M may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |