Audi 100 1982 vs SAAB 90 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 38 HP more power than SAAB 90, whereas torque is 26 NM more than SAAB 90. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 90, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger. Audi 100 is 21 cm longer than the SAAB 90, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.1 metres more than that of the SAAB 90, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
SAAB 90 has
| |