Audi 100 1990 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Audi 100 engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| 1250 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but lower. Audi 100 is 57 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 6200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |