Audi 100 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 23 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger. Audi 100 is 32 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |