Audi 100 1989 vs Opel Omega 1989

 
Audi 100
1989 - 1991
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds12.5 seconds
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi 100 engine produces 50 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.98.8
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 100 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.74 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi 100 is 5 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 570 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
610 litresno data
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity.
Audi 100 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`850no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 12003000
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv