Audi 100 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger. Audi 100 is 32 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |