Audi 100 1988 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but lower. Audi 100 is 57 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 6600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |