Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 7 HP less power than Volvo 940, but torque is 25 NM more than Volvo 940. Despite less power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.5 engine: Very reliable engine if not overheated. Occasionally, the high pressure fuel pump can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 470 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 940. The Volvo 940 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |