Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 103 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 960 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 960 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 491 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 960. The Volvo 960 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |