Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi 100 engine produces 89 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.2 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 491 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi 100 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 960. The Volvo 960 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |