Audi 100 1992 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 115 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Audi 100 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel Calibra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 2 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1855 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Audi 100 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 100, so Audi 100 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |