Audi 100 1991 vs Opel Omega 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 24 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.8 engine: This engine, especially at higher mileages, often tends to consume oil, and the timing belt change interval in particular should be observed. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 2 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1855 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Audi 100 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 100, so Audi 100 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |