Audi 100 1992 vs Opel Omega 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Audi 100 and Opel Omega have the same engine power, but Audi 100 torque is 5 NM more than Opel Omega. Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi 100 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi 100 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Audi 100 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 2 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1855 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Audi 100 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 100, so Audi 100 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |