Audi 100 1992 vs Audi 100 1986
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Audi 100 1992 engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi 100 1986, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Audi 100 1986. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 1986 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 1992 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100 1986, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 1992 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 1992 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100 1986. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 1986 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 1992 and Audi 100 1986 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 610 litres | |
| Audi 100 1992 has 180 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100 1986. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 1992 (by 700 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 1992 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 100 1986. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |