Audi 100 1991 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Omega, but torque is 15 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1190 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.5 engine: Very reliable engine if not overheated. Occasionally, the high pressure fuel pump can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Audi 100 is smaller. Audi 100 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 100 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Audi 100 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |