Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 940 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 33 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.6 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.5 engine: Very reliable engine if not overheated. Occasionally, the high pressure fuel pump can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Audi 100 has 602 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 815 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |